Once again, The Desert Review knocks it out of the park!

 Redpill Fasttrack link

This is the link if you need to catch up to everyone else, or if you need to make sure you didn't miss anything as far as the latest information goes.    

Published and Peer Reviewed! the case for IVM (prev post was deleted how?)

 Not sure exactly where my previous post went that I had been linking.. but here is an update:

Ivermectin, majority of test show positive benefit, the data has been published here:

https://trialsitenews.com/news-roundup-uk-based-meta-analysis-on-ivermectin-peer-reviewed-published/

Article 1 | UK-based Meta Analysis Peer Reviewed & Published Suggests Ivermectin A Key Public Health Weapon in the War Against COVID-19:
Recently published in the peer-reviewed American Journal of Therapeutics, Dr. Tess Lawrie, an expert in medicinal evidence, along with other experts in population health and gastroenterology out of the United Kingdom (UK), conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis involving the certainty of evidence using an approach known as GRADE, which led to the focus on twenty-four ivermectin-centered randomized controlled trials involving 3,406 participants.

Article Link | https://trialsitenews.com/uk-based-meta-analysis-peer-reviewed-published-suggests-ivermectin-a-key-public-health-weapon-in-the-war-against-covid-19/

AND here:

https://trialsitenews.com/ivermectin-meta-analysis-evidencing-positive-impact-of-ivermectin-picked-up-by-biospace/

TrialSite calls attention to Alex Keown’s recent article showcasing the recent meta-analysis published in the American Journal of Therapeutics indicating that ivermectin as a potential treatment for COVID-19. Led by well-respected public health advocate Dr. Tess Lawrie, the comprehensive study shows that the generic drug used as an anti-parasitic medicine reduces the risk of death in mild-to-moderate COVID-19 patients by an average of 62%. The study also indicated the risk of death was far lower in those taking ivermectin (2.3%) versus not (7.8%) among hospitalized patients. 

TrialSite commends BioSpace for picking up this critically important story. A well-respected online media focusing on biopharmaceutical drug development, few so-called mainstream media in the health and life science sector picked up this particular news. 

Direct meta analysis link is here:
https://journals.lww.com/americantherapeutics/Fulltext/2021/08000/Ivermectin_for_Prevention_and_Treatment_of.7.aspx

Citation:
Bryant, Andrew MSc1,*; Lawrie, Theresa A. MBBCh, PhD2; Dowswell, Therese PhD2; Fordham, Edmund J. PhD2; Mitchell, Scott MBChB, MRCS3; Hill, Sarah R. PhD1; Tham, Tony C. MD, FRCP4 Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines, American Journal of Therapeutics: July/August 2021 - Volume 28 - Issue 4 - p e434-e460

doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000001402 

Protocol information and related links and tons more evidence: 
https://covid19criticalcare.com/

Link to all the trials for Ivermectin, HCQ, Fluvoxamine, Vit D, colchicine, etc
https://c19ivermectin.com/   Database of all ivermectin COVID-19 studies. 101 studies, 64 peer reviewed, 62 with results comparing treatment and control groups.

Our health organizations have failed us, including the CDC and WHO

Doctors have been talking about, and treating with, Ivermectin since April of 2020.  Thousands of patients have been documented since that time, with nothing but good reports, in the treatment of Covid19.   
It may not save 100% of the people 100% of the time, but to my knowledge, there has not been 1 negative result from using Ivermectin. 

But it HAS shown efficacy up to 93% (conservative estimate, it could be higher), when used to treat Ivermectin in all stages of the disease, even prophylaxis and late stage disease.  93 studies, 54 peer reviewed, 56 with results comparing treatment and control groups.  The science CANNOT be denied!

On June 8, 2021, it will have been 6 full months since Dr Pierre Kory testified at the Senate hearing and begged them to just look at the data, have the health advisors and health officials to look at the data.
The data was that good.  It could have saved more lives than you can count, estimated 50% to 95% of 3.454 Million people as of 24may2021

Only a few studies (3 at this time?), which seemed designed to fail in the first place, were quoted by certain health agencies or Pharma companies, that do NOT show significant positive benefit or efficacy.

This pandemic has proven that our health orgs the world over, with very few exceptions, have failed us.  When the top orgs in the largest countries FAIL to understand, and share this information, they have failed us, and have blood on their hands for the deaths that follow since that date.

I am listening to the livestream while typing this.. more info in the comment, and I will leave this here for retrieval later, because it is likely that  BigTech shall step in with more censorship, because they to, care about something more than human lives.

FLCCC statement on the disinformation coming from the WHO 

Dr Lawrie, Ivermectin video, Short Precise update covering the longer, more technical interview

And there you have it.  A serious scientific professional interpreting the evidence on Ivermectin

Efficacy up to 93% , being as critical as possible 63%.  Full results likely to be higher in the end, but several studies were stopped due to it becoming clear that it would be immoral to continue the trial with the control group missing out on life saving medicine for the sake of more data.  Lives > "policy".

In spite of this, there is PLENTY Of evidence, data, and real world testimony of very qualified doctors and researchers to move forward across the world.  Czech Republic was the latest to approve, and I expect all the other dominoes to start following suit.

The only question is, when will YOUR country adopt this life saving treatment along with the vaccines to end this pandemic, and how many lives will be saved by how SOON they do this.

Following that, we must ask some serious questions of our health institutions and agencies, about competency, and anything else that might have gotten in the way of implementing the obviously wisest choice in a more timely fashion.