Kyle Rittenhouse Appears in Court - Media Perpetuates LIES About His Case

The problem with media bias can be easily seen in this report the host reads to us, and critiques where exactly it's biased, and talks about how it helps fuel the riots and violence we saw for most of the year in 2020.
The host of Rekieta Law Store clearly defines that he's going to give his interpretation and legal viewpoint, along with his personal bias in the favor of Kyle (in this case), in the beginning of the video.

Even when you can't find unbiased news sources, it can often help understanding to get opposing views as opposed to just one side.  More often than not, I see those around me getting news from one bias, usually the #MSM which is a conglomerate owned by 6 organizations with the majority parroting the others.  I wouldn't be surprised to see cross investment ownership among those 6 owners.  
Some of you will already be aware of the problem, but when your average person can assume since CNN, MSNBC, and AP News are all saying exactly the same thing, there must not be any reason to question it.
I would counter that if they seem to be using the same keywords and it's almost verbatim the same thing, THAT is a GOOD reason to question it, and looking for more sources would be in your best interest.

ANTRIM CASE DISMISSED! Now What??? w/ Matt Deperno & Bill Bailey - not as bad as it sounds

Maybe not as bad as it sounds, there is no determination about evidence, it's about the case being MOOT because he cannot grant and relief if all is true, etc .. so watch the video, it's explained in the first couple of minutes



In MI there is legislation (since 1963 or something?) that any voter can challenge the election and permitted to audit the election , and have been small changes periodically since then, as recently as 2019?

This will likely lead to a better definition of what an audit entails, and who's allowed to define that, and if they are allowed to make changes, and statutes not being able to limit the amendment (currently they do?) 
"as prescribed by law" will need addressed vs amendments, statutes, and who can change

Currently, the SoS seems to be have excess power to change legislature via statute, which should not be, and is the defendant in a case, but is able to define what the audit encompasses, which is a conflict of interest, and probably a legal issue on top of a definition issue with complications.

There will be more.