Children can hide sex-change operations, abortions from parents WTF??

Another piece of the puzzle re: Ivermectin and Merck and now possibly mutagenic molnupiravir

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2021-03-25/merck-mrk-molnupiravir-pill-could-change-the-fight-against-covid

tl:dr

STOP! READ before decisions! It's the worst, too many things we hoped were not true, have been proven true by Autopsy 👀😱

👀😱
STOP!
READ before decisions about VAX!
It's the worst, too many things we hoped were not true, have been proven true by Autopsy. :(


https://fatherlyadviceandrants.com/2021/08/09/pathologist-explains-impact-of-covid-vaccines-on-human-organs/ 

I'm mad
I feel nauseous and worried for any family and friends that already got the vaccine.
If you haven't got the shot yet, DON'T!
Do NOT give it to ANY children of any age! 
Do NOT get it if you ever want to have kids.  Females for sure, but based on a couple things I heard, I'm betting equally applies to males as well.

That's the bad news, here is the good advice from Dr Peter McCollough, bookmarked at "for kids" part

https://youtu.be/xWBC-JX6lsg?t=463

Read previous post first, time may be of the essence....

 https://fatherlyadviceandrants.com/2021/08/31/august-2021-conservative-article-reference-list/

Capitol Police Officer Commander of the House Michael Leroy Byrd tells NBC he shot Ashli Babbitt

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/aug/26/michael-leroy-byrd-capitol-police-lieutenant-says-/ 

officer admitted to an NBC interviewer

the shooting doesn't look like he was just doing his job to me.. watch STOPHATE.com "righting history" for a 2 angle view of what happened at that door, and just how many NON trump supporters were around here when it happened

and that is an understatement

Edit: adding link to stophate 
https://stophate.com/righting-history

John Ioannidis' (J P A I's) New Paper On Vaccinating Kids & College Stud...

Dominion Voting Systems under scrutiny for security

I can't wait to see Dominion FRY in a DEEP SMELTER of Electromagnetic LAVA!

but really, OANN was the only network I remember being this accurate as far back as Nov 18, 2020!

Bravo

For brave mostly healthy souls, the Principle Trial study and the ACT VI

Favipiravir (an antiviral drug)
Ivermectin 
and Standard of Care (current protocols) 



https://www.principletrial.org/

Ivermectin Coverup summary in June 21...

Dr Pierre Kory gave testimony in front of the Senate Hearing 

Dr. David Martin, PhD discusses the criminal violations of Fauci a YEAR ago!

I reported on this in recent months, summer 2021
This video is from Sep of 2020!!! Over 11 months ago, almost 12.

LATE BREAKING! Katie Hobbs Was WRONG! Maricopa County "Sees The Light!" ...

summary later.. 

Milton Friedman - Your Greed or Their Greed?

Sweeping Vaccine Mandates or False info on Vax? more Vaccinated dying or hospitalized in UK in latest statistics

APPROVE IVERMECTIN NOW!

Texas Senate Committee - Dr. Urso & Dr. McCullough testify / Covid lockd...

Adding version with Dr Urso as well as Dr McCullough

Lessons from Life, Parenting, Birth, Abortion, Responsibilities...

This one is rough, and I'm not sure about posting it here, so I'll keep it short, in the hopes it helps others to be aware. My ex and I went through something very similar, almost to 6 months. Previously, I did not think I could handle a child with a major birth defect. We had 2 kids, our living and work situation was very unstable, relationship was unstable, I couldn't feel I could predict where we would be even a few months down the road, etc... but she had always been she'd love her baby no matter what, no matter any disability. When it came down to it, somewhere along the way, we found our daughter yet to be born, had a birth defect, an encephalocele . Her skull had not closed when forming, and her brain was only half inside. She was unlikely to survive birth, or for long if she did, but would likely be permanently and severely disabled, even if she did make it. So when we finally get to this point, all previous thoughts went out the window, and I felt no matter what, if she was strong enough to survive, then I would be strong enough to take care of her. Whatever it took. You think you know, but until you are in that moment.. that's when you know. My ex ALSO had a 180 degree reversal. She decided she could not do it. She was sure, or mostly sure, but time was short. There was a state legal limit for an abortion, and it was fast approaching. We were not married. I had no say. I could only tell her how I felt, as she had once felt, and respect her decision. It was a gut wrenching helpless feeling. Even if we HAD been married, I would have done pretty much the same. Maybe offered a bit more convincing commitment, but not pressured her. She went through the abortion, and because it was so far along, she was traumatized. It seems common that they don't prep women fully for what "might" happen, and when you are pregnant, hormones are usually running close to maximum the further along you get. It takes two to make a child. It SHOULD take two to raise your children, and any family and friends that are close enough to help, too. It doesn't HAVE to take two, many times people are faced with no choice but to continue as a single parent, and props to those parents who do it alone. But it's almost always healthier to have two if it's a healthy relationship. "Staying together" for the kids in an unhealthy relationship rarely works, as you end up setting a bad example for the kids, and teaching by example is one of the easiest ways to raise your kids, and the easiest for them to learn. Be who you want your kids to be, be in the kind of relationship you want for your kids when they are grown. It will save you a lot of explaining, and trying to find the right time to explain, etc There is a lot of talk about abortion with the Texas law change, currently at "detectable heartbeat" which many are claiming is 6 weeks, which is all over the news. Some are saying it's more like 12 weeks, which is more reasonable, but there still seem to be plenty of ways for people to not find out in time to have that option. Of course, some want no abortion, the stance being life begins at conception, on the one extreme. And I certainly don't agree with those who voted for abortion all the way up until the baby is DELIVERED AT FULL TERM. I never have and never will, and that's from a science and mother nature viewpoint, not a religious one. When talking to people about this trying to find the MIDDLE ground, because that will make the most sense for everyone to be able to except and live together in the same community, it seems the "viability" argument can't go any farther than 20 weeks, because we have a half a dozen babies born at 21 weeks and some change who survived! 

In older times, they used the "quickening" when the mother can feel the baby start to move around, and kick and such, starting to exercise. 

This one is rough, and I'm not sure about posting it here, so I'll keep it short, in the hopes it helps others to be aware. My ex and I went through something very similar, almost to 6 months. Previously, I did not think I could handle a child with a major birth defect. We had 2 kids, our living and work situation was very unstable, relationship was unstable, I couldn't feel I could predict where we would be even a few months down the road, etc... but she had always been she'd love her baby no matter what, no matter any disability. When it came down to it, somewhere along the way, we found our daughter yet to be born, had a birth defect, an encephalocele . Her skull had not closed when forming, and her brain was only half inside. She was unlikely to survive birth, or for long if she did, but would likely be permanently and severely disabled, even if she did make it. So when we finally get to this point, all previous thoughts went out the window, and I felt no matter what, if she was strong enough to survive, then I would be strong enough to take care of her. Whatever it took. You think you know, but until you are in that moment.. that's when you know. My ex ALSO had a 180 degree reversal. She decided she could not do it. She was sure, or mostly sure, but time was short. There was a state legal limit for an abortion, and it was fast approaching. We were not married. I had no say. I could only tell her how I felt, as she had once felt, and respect her decision. It was a gut wrenching helpless feeling. Even if we HAD been married, I would have done pretty much the same. Maybe offered a bit more convincing commitment, but not pressured her. She went through the abortion, and because it was so far along, she was traumatized. It seems common that they don't prep women fully for what "might" happen, and when you are pregnant, hormones are usually running close to maximum the further along you get. It takes two to make a child. It SHOULD take two to raise your children, and any family and friends that are close enough to help, too. It doesn't HAVE to take two, many times people are faced with no choice but to continue as a single parent, and props to those parents who do it alone. But it's almost always healthier to have two if it's a healthy relationship. "Staying together" for the kids in an unhealthy relationship rarely works, as you end up setting a bad example for the kids, and teaching by example is one of the easiest ways to raise your kids, and the easiest for them to learn. Be who you want your kids to be, be in the kind of relationship you want for your kids when they are grown. It will save you a lot of explaining, and trying to find the right time to explain, etc There is a lot of talk about abortion with the Texas law change, currently at "detectable heartbeat" which many are claiming is 6 weeks, which is all over the news. Some are saying it's more like 12 weeks, which is more reasonable, but there still seem to be plenty of ways for people to not find out in time to have that option. Of course, some want no abortion, the stance being life begins at conception, on the one extreme. And I certainly don't agree with those who voted for abortion all the way up until the baby is DELIVERED AT FULL TERM. I never have and never will, and that's from a science and mother nature viewpoint, not a religious one. When talking to people about this trying to find the MIDDLE ground, because that will make the most sense for everyone to be able to except and live together in the same community, it seems the "viability" argument can't go any farther than 20 weeks, because we have a half a dozen babies born at 21 weeks and some change who survived! In older times, they used the "quickening" when the mother can feel the baby start to move around, and kick and such, starting to exercise. But this seems to range from 13 to 20 weeks.. usually 16 to 18? At least that's what my research is showing. The compromise to me, seems like it should be 16 weeks, half way between 12 and 20. Maybe down to 12 in your more conservative states, and up to 20 in your more liberal states, and otherwise 16 if people can't come to a consensus or vote. Now, as a parent, AND an Elder, I feel I need to remind you ideological people on both sides, ABORTIONS WILL HAPPEN whether legal or not! History has shown us how unhealthy and dangerous it can be when not legal at all, so the lower in weeks you go, the more dangerous abortions you'll end up having, across state lines, country lines, with bad doctors, in back alleys... etc. Though I suspect these days, with more untested "abortion pills", as easier to get, and then doctors can avoid the nazi like "anyone can report you for doing abortions" law, which sounds just as ridiculous as mandates, if not worse, seems like a step further, turning in your neighbor for not being vaxxed! And ANYONE who is PRO LIFE should be ready to have Sex Education and birth control as a good first line defense, should have programs for people who want to adopt because they can't have kids (and must be fully vetted and stable!), and needs to be helping with programs for helping parents and children to make sure everyone grows up healthy and loved, to breed out all the bad seeds that get abused when younger and pass it on to others when older. It's a pattern that has been around for a long time and must be broken. It is also the responsibility of EVERY adult in a community to protect and nurture the young, so they don't grow up to be a Hitler or Atilla the Hun! And to do that, you need to make sure all the adults are healthy, and keep the unhealthy ones away from the kids! Common Sense, don't trust blindly, err on the side of caution. Etc. Teach the kids as they grow how much responsibility it is to take care of all the kids, and you'll gain some natural free birth control right there! Don't let anyone be incentivized to collect dead baby parts, no matter how much they say it will help Science and Research, because more bad than good will come from it! And for the Love of everything Holy, STOP using the acronym and word STEM when talking Education and classes.. older generations only hear "Stem Cell Research" echoing through our heads from the 80s, and more conspiracies about Pizza Gate, eating babies, adrenochrome, and clones in the spotlight from the lizard people run rampant! Call it METS to avoid this, and why isn't Language in there? What good is being as smart as Einstein if you can't convey your ideas to others, or negotiate a better salary or contract, or teach your children the knowledge passed down to you to pass down to them, etc? So call it MELTS or SMELT.. Math, Engineering, Science, Technology seem like too much redundancy, and like they would prefer and army of androids over humans! So change one to something more HUMAN because we already know what happens when you try to make everyone into a robot and don't teach humans how to BE humans. It's a mess and not sustainable.

Social? Sociology? Synergy? Someone else can be InternetDAD or InternetMOM for a bit, I need to exit the matrix before I get stuck here...

Richard Urso, MD testifies to Texas Senate HHS Committee

This explains so much regarding HCQ, Ivermectin, and the problems within our government and health orgs

Large coverage article for Ivermectin for Covid19 with many links

This article covers the subject fairly extensively with citations to many studies so you can form your own opinion

https://www.thedesertreview.com/opinion/columnists/the-great-ivermectin-deworming-hoax/article_19b8f2a6-0f29-11ec-94c1-4725bf4978c6.html 

Politics: Russiagate not a Hoax? claims TheAtSlantic

 titled "russia gate is not a hoax" yet, these are the lines that stand out to me... 

By Franklin Foer

"Instead of rushing forward, the committee left the incendiary question of collusion for last.

The thousand-page fifth volume doesn’t definitively settle the question"
- Not being able to settle a question in 1,000 pages sounds like a problem, not a solution or definitive answer.  As in they WANT you to believe it, even though they don't have conclusive evidence.

[I will finish this later, too many more important things to cover, but this is easily debunked, and you can see "TheSLAtlantic" for what is truly is...]

France bans mail-in ballots and voting machines

France bans mail-in ballots and voting machines


 https://www.cairco.org/news/france-bans-mail-ballots-and-voting-machines

The real story about Ivermectin in the Cincinnati case from the DR who prescribed

 From Dr. Wagshul:

Since late August, there has been a full-on media assault against ivermectin for COVID-19. Part of the media coverage included the story of the Cincinnati woman who filed a lawsuit in Butler County to compel West Chester Hospital to give her husband ivermectin after they told her there was nothing more they could do for him. Her husband, Jeff Smith, had been on a ventilator for about one month.

After a lengthy discussion with his wife concerning Mr. Smith’s clinical status and his medical history, I agreed to prescribe ivermectin to Mr. Smith—since the hospital was refusing any additional therapy. The case went forward, and the judge granted the court order.

Then the media pounced.

They called ivermectin “horse dewormer” …though it has saved millions the world over for decades since it was approved by the FDA in 1987. It is one of the world’s safest medicines. It is on the WHO’s list of “Essential Medicines.” It is inexpensive and globally available. Plus, dozens of peer-reviewed, scientific studies show that it is efficacious for every stage of COVID-19 disease.

And it won its developers the Nobel Prize in Medicine in 2015 for its ability to save millions of lives throughout the world.

So why has ivermectin been in the crosshairs of the media? My take: Ivermectin is cheap, so it is unprofitable. It is a workhorse of a drug and has emerged as a proven, lifesaving therapy for COVID-19. This…while pharmaceutical companies race to develop their own “ivermectin-like” antiviral drugs—whose modes of action are similar to ivermectin. These new drugs won’t be cheap. They will be very profitable. But I believe that when they are rolled out in the future, they will never be able to be as efficacious for COVID-19 as ivermectin is right now.

So this is just to let you know that regardless of what the media may say, I know this medicine, as part of a multi-modal protocol that also includes vaccines, saves lives. On the day I became a physician, I swore to “first do no harm” as part of the Hippocratic Oath. With this essay, I am publicly recommitting myself to that oath. It is my hope that other physicians around the world will do the same.

It is true that after a patient has been on a ventilator for a prolonged period of time fighting the debilitating effects of COVID-19, options to recover these patients are few. But I have seen patients who’ve spent weeks on a ventilator be successfully weaned away and return home to their families—with the addition of ivermectin to the therapeutic cocktail.

I have worked with Buffalo, New York attorney Ralph Lorigo on several of these cases requiring court orders for ivermectin. Lorigo has prevailed in all but one of these cases. That means that the judges are recognizing the validity of the science for ivermectin.

It is written in the Talmud that “those who save one life save the entire world.” Where there is life, there is hope. If we forget that as doctors, and if we throw up our hands and do not try everything we know to save every life we can, then we are in violation of the oath we took to act in the best interest of every patient.

Every patient.

In early January, 2021, when the Critical Care team of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) met with the NIH’s COVID-19 treatment panel, nearly 4,000 American were dying everyday of COVID-19. The team asked the NIH To recommend ivermectin as part of a COVID-19 prevention and early treatment protocol. (I+MASK+). The NIH came back with a “neutral” stance on ivermectin, falling well short of the advice of the FLCCC to recommend the early treatment protocols that were saving lives in the regions and countries of the world where they were being used. This is a profound failure of the U.S. government to protect its citizens during a killer pandemic.

So, to Jeffrey Smith and his family, I will keep fighting for you. You deserve this chance. And I will do everything I can to ensure that you get it.

If you’d like to to know more… https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/SUMMARY-OF-THE-EVIDENCE-BASE-FINAL.pdf

PART 2: Dr. Robert Malone on Ivermectin, Escape Mutants & Faulty Logic o...

ONE WRONG MOVE AND PEOPLE DIE. INTERVIEW WITH COL WALDREN. WHAT'S THE RE...

Bjorn Lomborg | Don't waste trillions on BAD Climate Policy

Making sure this is on both blogs, because it's politics/agendas based on "science"
And we are going to have to continually insist on correct data, updated data, no exaggerations of data, etc

Don't Trust Big Pharma? WATCH THIS!!!