Maybe not as bad as it sounds, there is no determination about evidence, it's about the case being MOOT because he cannot grant and relief if all is true, etc .. so watch the video, it's explained in the first couple of minutes
In MI there is legislation (since 1963 or something?) that any voter can challenge the election and permitted to audit the election , and have been small changes periodically since then, as recently as 2019?
This will likely lead to a better definition of what an audit entails, and who's allowed to define that, and if they are allowed to make changes, and statutes not being able to limit the amendment (currently they do?)
"as prescribed by law" will need addressed vs amendments, statutes, and who can change
Currently, the SoS seems to be have excess power to change legislature via statute, which should not be, and is the defendant in a case, but is able to define what the audit encompasses, which is a conflict of interest, and probably a legal issue on top of a definition issue with complications.
There will be more.
*MY* Collection of posts that relate to a Healthy Community, the information needed to have a healthy community, and a place to discuss these topics to improve those ideas. As well as, a place to share all the potentially harmful information, misinformation, and DISinformation, because TALKING about it, and Sharing the TRUTH, citing facts with data and sources, is how you best deal with misinformation, not the "thought police" ministry of propaganda defense! Warning is for some Foul Language
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Including description from the video on YouTube (click on title of video in post to go to YouTube if you need to see it bigger, I noticed th...
-
the original hearing (part 2) with ORIGINAL title in case they try to keep censoring what should be HEADLINE NEWS! That's their YouTube ...
-
But then... https://communityparadox.blogspot.com/2021/10/this-was-big-trick-played-on-everybody.html
No comments:
Post a Comment